Hey guys, it's a banner for Amazon.com's Godzilla store page. Amazon Godzilla Store

yeah thats what im saying, even if it is a new banner, its the same godzilla pic weve been getting for a while now so meh this doesnt really matter for me

**Image Removed at request of Bandai America**

Don't you guys remember this? This is old news.

Transformers: Age of Extinction looks so stupid. I can't wait to see it. Haha.

nope its just smoke, and that's what it was intended to be, if i wanted to add mutos id do it- erm i mean.....

ill one up on this and show you my edit

theres more where that came from

@KYERO even if you are a photoshop pro, anotehr photoshop pro can make images look insanely good and real so its hard to tell.

and it's real, it's part of the godzilla toy merch on amazon, we've already seen this same pose and same godzilla picture so I don't really care about this one

@Kyero

How many scripts have you read? I've read a few hundred in my life and they were all written as bad or worse than this. Just because it seems silly or stupid to you doesn't mean thats not how scripts are written.

My person experience with script writing classes really; they say really 'sensationalize' how you write. If you've ever read the the script for the first transformers film, you'd be laughing out loud. Its so sensationalized and over-dramatically written. That is purposefully done to paint a dramatic picture.

There is nothing unprofessional about this script, its how they are written. I doubt it is real, but this person obviously has read a bunch of scripts.

And no, normal grammar rules do not apply to scripts writing. 

There will be no Toho Kaiju in this movie besides Godzilla himself. That has been confirmed numerous times throughout the years and the idea that two lesser known and not very well liked Kaiju like Kumonga and Kamakura would be brought into this film are slim to none.

I know a lot of people want to see revisions of Toho Kaiju, but here's a fact that none of them want to hear: Not all Kaiju age well or deserve to be revisited with modern technology or filming techniques.

None of the Toho Kaiju besides Godzilla himself deserve to be recreated in my eyes. They all have their place in the Toho archives and in the movies that we know and love so much. But that's also just it: They should stay there. The Toho lineup doesn't need a revision, revival, or revisit. Godzilla is more than enough on his own. Despite how cool some of the Toho Kaiju are, they don't deserve a spot in the Legendary franchise, nor do they even need to be revisited at all. They're fine the way they are.

@Kyero

Its a drawing dude, chill the hell out, not everything needs a wall of text. We know you like flexing your intellectual muscle here, but if you really wanted to prove you're smart, why don't you go to an academia oriented forum and converse amongst those mental giants and leave us mental dwarves alone.

This is incredibly unprofessional and the legitimacy of it is clear: it's bs.

It is in fact photoshopped, and the lower image was created by a member on this site actually. I can't remember what they're name is, but they're here and they posted about it a few times before.

I get what you mean KYERO, but it just seems eye-like to me. It could might aswell be absolutely nothing. But then again, with that shot i had very little to work with. There was just that little tidbit.

As with most, I'm skeptical about the legitimacy of this being for the film. If it's legit, it's for a toy.

But for those who think that it's photoshopped, look again. There's no clear lines, no obviously bent or warped segments. Nothing. The image itself doesn't seem photoshopped at all. I'm no expert at using it, since I only do basic editing with shadows and stacking images from time to time, but still I'm not seeing anything photoshopped about that image. If anyone who is an expert on photoshop can comment on this, and I mean someone who has used it for years and has a background in photography of a true professional nature and not just another kid saying "I use it all the time so I'm pro!", that'd be great.

Well, I can't say I'm not impressed by the devotion to rumors.

Still, that shot with the train doesn't have an eyeball. It only takes a single simple look to see that it's solid flesh/hide/(insert word for skin here). There is no eyeshine, no pupil, nothing that indicates an eye of any kind. Even taking the imagine and sharpening it mutliple times led to nothing but the same solid color as the rest of its flesh. I know everyone wants to believe that's a face, but it's not. It could be any part of the MUTO's biology. The simple fact is that whomever called that the MUTO's face was jumping to conclusions after seeing what they wanted to see.

As for the rest of it, they seem fairly accurate and most of them make decent sense given the situations surrounding them (save for the MUTO "face" that's not a face).

Still, it's fun to come up with different theories for each image and each sequence in the trailer. I'm wondering if anyone else will go to the trouble of doing something like this.

Not to be rude, but what is this speculation based on again?

If it's that convenient "what was the name of the production during filming?" question that's fueling your speculation, then you're following a theory that was created and based on zero fact colletion efforts and zero evidence collection. The only thing that remotely hints that there could be a sea creature MUTO based on a Nautilus is that one of the MUTO's is multi-limbed, but that's not nearly enough evidence to support such a theory when so many other creatures and possibilities fall into that category.

There are four important facts that point to the MUTOs being land/air based creatures and not aquatic.

One, the numerous pictures of the sink holes. Two, none of the information leaks or shots in the trailer point to uniquely aquatic locations or settings. Three, the fact that both of the teasers were showing land based enemies. And four, the official information given thus far in the toys confirms a MUTO with wings.

The teasers weren't final in any way, that's true, but the fact that no aquatic creatures were shown or even hinted of in either one of them, let alone the official trailer, doesn't bode well for an aquatic MUTO. Sure the argument could be made that "they're trying to surprise us," but that's an incredibly flimsy argument and it has no evidence to support it that actually has merit.

Just sayin'.

Amazon

guys this old and fake no need to decuss

also remember this 

but you never know

oh wow

Where exactly did you get this? Cuz if you snagged it off of Deviantart I'm positive we don't even need to discuss any sort of legitimacy whatsoever.

I dont think this is legit.

But i have just been at deviantART, so its from there. And it does look fraking awesome! If it is legit though...

Whats with the lightning? Its like the package for the small brown figure, there also quite a bit of lightning.

Fantasy movies like never get those Oscar nominations, only nonfake realistic movies, so no Oscar for Godzilla, but will definitelly get like best special effects

Dont mistaken this by a bunch of smoke

Well that didn't happen... As a side note that Transformers trailer looked boss!!! Optimus riding T-Rex Grimlock ftw!!!!!

I'm going to go with my favorite in this fight, Godzilla 1984, not only for the fact that he towers over '54, but that he's meaner and his atomic ray is a lot more potent.

Not even once.

Listen, I'm not trying to sound stupid here.  The original Gojira was a monster movie, yes, but it was supposed to be more symbolic and stand for the atomic bomb and the destruction we inflict upon ourselves.  I'm not saying, "Oh yeah, a monster movie could totally be nominated just becuase I like Godzilla!"  If Gareth Edwards stands true to his word about this film being grounded in reality and making Godzilla a force of nature again, it might actually have a shot.  I'm not stating anything in stone or that I think it will get nominated for sure, but with the A-list cast, visual effects specialists and Edwards at the helm, it seems that it could stand a chance.  Of course we'll have to see the movie first, but from what we know so far, it looks promising in my opinion.

Doggiezilla,

...

...nevermind.

Godzilla will win for best movie ever made.

PFFFFT Who needs kiju? I'M SMAUG

^Ditto.

Man I don't think it will win anything, but its sequel will!

So will with the Avengers vs Justice League movie.

C'mon guys, that is how rediculous you sound. I don't wanna be mean-- but its way to early to make any estimation like this. 

I think it's far too early to speculate any of this, but at most Godzilla might get some technical nods: Visual effects, sound effects, sound editing... stuff like that. You're kidding yourselves if you think it could possibly be up for anything else. No one will consider this for acting or directing awards-- whether it's true or not.

Akagi,

I think you're putting a little too much stock into actors, teen audiences...etc... I don't necessarily disagree with you, but name recognition and good looking actors only go so far. Iron Man came out during the height of the superhero boom with a strong ad campaign, Robert Downey Jr.'s suave power and word of mouth for a great movie. Transformers, granted, had Megan Fox. But Michael Bay's name was recognized before Transformers and his name was used to sell the movie. Fox's was not. Thor had Chris Hemsworth, but he was an unknown at the time. Thor was riding on the success of other successful Marvel movies: Iron Man, Iron Man 2, Hulk...etc... People had caught on that these movies were connected by then.

Word of mouth does a great deal for movies and sometimes a good movie is enough to sell itself. Not always, granted, but it still happens. I don't doubt star power has a lot to do with some movies' success, but some of the examples you're using are a bit of a stretch.

@akagi, do you like to just steorotype young females? Or just generalize everyone? Because there are plenty of movies with attractive casts that didn't do well (LONE RANGER, JOHN CARTER). Yes, cast is important, but it's more than just attraction. Also, FYI, King Kong made $500 million worldwide. Not amazing, but still impressive.

As for if it will put Superhero movies to sleep? Probably not. But it does seem like dinosaurs and monsters are getting popular again. Transformers 4 features dinobots, Jurassic World is coming out next year, and if a new Pacific Rim gets green lit we might well be in for a renewal, or better well put a "renaissance" of Kaiju film. Maybe that Will Smith Ultraman film will happen.

@GODZILLAFAN1995

I'm not sure if you understand how the theatrical market works, but Godzilla fans probably make up a small, maybe 1.2 percent of movie goers/ticket sales-- for a film to do well, it needs to appeal to a massive audience. If you had told me fifteen years ago that Bayformers would have made as much money as it has, I would have laughed at you.

But in the end Shia put young girls asses in seats and Megan Fox put teen boy asses in seats. Before Bayformers, people made fun of transformers, no one knew about it or even cared, now everyone acts like they've always been fans.

Look at King Kong, it had a great team behind it, Peter Jackson's name attached to it, but it didn't have the RIGHT star power. King Kong did so bad in the theaters, I don't think it even made as much money as the Pokemon movie. 

No matter how GOOD the Godzilla film is, it won't do well without appeal to the CORE movie going demographic-- which are teenagers. 

Anyone who works at a movie theater would testify to the fact that adults over the age of 21 make up a very small portion fo movie goers. Every time I go to the theater I can say the majority of asses in seats are ages 9-17. 

So yes, I do think the cast has a lot to do with how well a film does, ask any producer-- they'll tell you that big budget films will always have popular actors in them to guarantee patronage. 

Teen girls wouldn't have flocked to Ironman if it was about some fat unknown actor, they wouldn't have flocked to Thor if it wasn't for Chris Hemsworth.

The movie is fine. It's like an improved Heisei movie with stronger character relationships and better special effects.

I don't like the suit. The design itself fine, but the suit is a major step down from the lively Heisei suits. It looks very plastic, has no facial animatronics what-so-ever and it can't even turn its head. The spikes are far too big. They look way out of proportion with the rest of its body. And I hate the green and purple coloring. The color combination is a little too close to Barney for my tastes.

The suit was much improved when the Kiryu movies came out.

Completely out of the realm of possibility; but if it happened, I'd be more than willing to eat my words. 

Realisticly 1984 because hes bigger. lol