
Akio123
MemberMothra LarvaeJan-03-2014 4:46 AMThis will be my last discussion on this topic. I know that it has been done many times before, even by myself. Yet, I had never got the chance to really explain my side and thoughts regarding the realism to Godzilla in this new film. Forgive my hard-to-understand explaining, I tend to overthink as I write.
When discussing "Realsim" with this new Godzilla movie, It was never actually about Godzilla himself. Godzilla in this film will be the most "Realistic" adaptation due to him being portrayed more animalistic and as a real life creature. However, a 400ft or so lizard-creauture whom can focus radiation into a weaponary beam has no realsim at all. Atomic bombs do not just turn any living thing it touches into radiated behemoths. A creature that size couldn't even sustain itself(So we think).
When talking realism with this movie, I never meant Godzilla. There is no science behind such a thing, and forcing scientific reasoning to make Godzilla appear realistic is impractical. Its a monster, simple as that. When talking realsim, I mean the STORY, the REACTION, and most importantly, the AFTERMATH of something like this existing. The monster itself can never be real, and to focus on the monster being so, would take away from Godzilla as a whole. Godzilla is a METAPHOR for the atomic bomb. An atomic bomb is real, a creature like it? Never. But its the symbolism behind it that can make such a fantasy, a reality. The symbolism that shows how us as humans tampering with nature can end in the destruction amongst ourselves.
The realsim behind Godzilla lays in the horror, the sorrow of losing lives, the recieving of devastation, the reaction to seeing such a thing(Godzilla/Atomic bomb), the prolonged pain, the aftermath, and the hope to get through. Things that we as humans can relate to. Think about the bombing of Japan. That is what those people faced. Its the elements that SURROUND Godzilla that create the realsim, not the monster..But that is just my opinion.