Comments (Page 1,883)

@Godzilla Himself!

Woops! I didn't know you posted that picture already! :O Sorry!

(I removed the picture.)

As long as there's no ridiculous "monster martial arts" or human-style punching, etc. I'm fine with it. He's an animal and should fight like one: biting, clawing, etc...

I'd settle for just a lack of condescension on the part of some members. This is about a movie, not snobbery...

Can't see the trailer dude. Link please.

Check this out:

http://kaijubattle.blogspot.com/2014/03/one-lucky-fan-gets-godzilla-2014-toy.html

Even though its the same post as before, these spoilers still manage to keep us in suspense as to what will happen in the film.

I have still yet to understand why it is so difficult for an American distributor to get there hands on Return of Godzilla/Godzilla 1985?

It's a great movie! 

...

Aww your pics have to be on a site already....I don't think I'm gonna be able to show you my pics soz

Good drawings!

Sorry guys I was away for the night with no wifi, **AL** thanks fort the link and those are great drawings guysI ill put up s'more of my own soon aswell thanks 😊

Well, I for one am glad most people don't pay much regard to what I've posted before, even if I did put a lot of thought into some of them. Better to be ignored than scolded at, I guess. Either way, it'll be a VERY long two more months of waiting for the upcoming movie. My nostrils, my mouth, my gills, my dorsal spikes, my tail, my eyes, my ultra-hard skin, my enormous stature and proportions that don't falter under their own weight, and my atomic heart are all just itching to see what happens next.

P.S. I'm not saying I'm Godzilla in that little blurb in the end. I;m just that weird of a person.

Anyone remember this? 

Personally didn't see a problem but I don't use the 2014 section that much. Maybe people are just more civil in the classics section

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Any personal attacks I see I'll step in, I even screen cap it for evidence. The personal attacking isn't that bad, but regardless it shouldn't be happening and it won't be tolerated. This is a forum, so you can't prevent threads from being made, even if they lack thought. This site is starting to see more and more users each day. Any thread we see as pointless/off-topic/assaulting/ect  or a clear re-post will be closed. I do agree with you, people need to be more civil during the debates.

Thing is @AKAGI is too aggressive for example on that forum about the atomic roar toy, he talks saying that the Brazil promo face is the final design, I responded by saying it doesn't look like it, compare it to the empire cover it looks like it wasn't finished, what does he say 'it is the final design, deal with it' thats not the whole quote but it was a immature response despite the fact I used other evidence to back me up (I'll probably need to edit this as I am on my phone)

EDIT:forget what i said, it was early in the morning and i thought he was talking to me, he was talking to someone else who thought that toy was fake

i think the cover of King Kong Escapes is awesome lol. MechaKong looks incredibly...yeah

This is the second topic on Gills you've posted, and you didn't post any images backing your point, you just posted what you thought, like in the last one. Locking this

I 100% agree with you Madison. but today, i saw a discussion i got overly excited on and lashed out on Akagi. I think it was partially a misunderstanding on how he was worded everything and the fact i was frustrated it wasn't something legit and said somethings that were a little harsh. but after seeing his reply, I immediatly apologized and told him why i had said what i did and hopefully he saw it before the topic was closed. i kinda feel like this right now: 

What the hell is Sonys deal if double feature dvds and blue ray, why can't they use 1 movie on 1 disk like everyone else, is it too much money 

This is a great thread as I said, but for some reason it keeps sticking on my browser.

I saw the cover for King kong escapes... And my eyes started burning....

But it's kind of hard to believe that they would make a toy of a character that wouldn't be in the movie.

Thanks, it's still a little cluttered, but I'm limited with the formating. I'll shape it up a little better as more special features and info become available.

Excellent idea Gman2887

Thanks, Gman. Now THIS is a good post. You really put a lot of work into this.

Point proven. Locking this

Genius... locking this.

@Akagi

I apologize if i came off as a asshole. it's just that the way you probably had what you were saying in your head came off as a smart ass thing in mine. I had no actual intention on being offensive, and was frustrated that the discusstion wasn't actually legit. i just like to see every discussion on here be about something legit, but i do enjoy something funny here and there. i'm just a fan that sometimes gets overly excited about something i see, and i guess I got overly excited on this one. but now that i think about it, i see your point. and i do see how easy it is to photoshop something like that. but i still have some belief in it. now that fact that the Lizard toy was release BEFORE the movie actully blew me off guard, but i guess that's probably cause i didn't do my spidey homework. the "proof" i had about that part of the reply was the Beetlejuice thing i mention and assumed ( with out researching) that amazing spiderman did that as well. not even 100% sure if some of those beetlejuice toys were released before the film or not. But i do apologize for being a dick, it was just me getting overly excited. 

Seriously guys? There is no need for name calling.

(Facepalm) And Linkman just showed you an example of what I'm talking about. THIS is fun?

And Madison, you're right, it doesn't need to be closed if it's just for fun, but it SHOULD be closed (even if it's not), if it's just going to be, as I said, a source of arguing. If that's not what people want it to be, then they need to stop fueling the fire by bickering and actually make it FUN.

Now let me state that I'm in no way trying to rude, I just don't like seeing G-fans fighting. We're better than that, guys, and we need to prove it. :)

@Akagi- here's a fun fact: you're an a** hole

While I agree with your point about not necessarily depending on certain toys of something being in a movie, I honestly think this discussion does need to be closed if it's for nothing but arguing. That very thing is what we're all supposed to be avoiding here, Akagi.

And this doesn't appear to be 'all in good fun'. This appears to be a current source of bickering about something that isn't even worth fighting about. Plus, that comment about 90 percent of topics being misleading is not true. I've been on here a lot, and most of what I've seen are topics about people stating their opinion or coming up with theories or ideas about things. Only about ten to fifteen percent are ACTUALLY misleading, and most of the time it wasn't even on purpose.

What I'm basically trying to say is, and I'm gonna go ahead and say it, stop arguing about this. It's pointless.

Sometimes, I think Akagi is wrong.

Sometimes I think he right, but is a little too brash/harsh with how he delivers his honesty.

Sometimes, I think he is completely reasonable.

This post however..... 

Is one of his completely reasonable ones. It makes a good point, has a civil demeanor, and is actually pretty funny if you don't let butthurt cloud your judgement. 

Seriously guys, if we are going to try and ban/lock any clever levity around here then these forums will become a boring place indeed.

Well tell your scientist friend that godzilla doesn't give a **** about science. Godzilla doesn't listen to ****. You can't just through a bull**** scientific fact like tha into godzilla. Surviving nuclear blasts isn't real.....breathing out nuclear energy isn't real and we as fans can accept that fact but still enjoy the mists of forgeting about reality and expeiriancing imagination. But throwing scientific facts doesn't prove **** becuase godzilla isn't 100% realistic. You and your scientific friend can't prove anything just by throwing realistic facts at us.

Beleive what you want to believe but whiether you agree or not those are gills. Also I hope those people who say that they are not gills just because they are scientist don't show up. It doesn't matter if your a rocket scientist or a moron. Also i'm not saying it because i'm right....its called using logical thinking. If you believe that they are not gills so much then i'm fine with it. Just please lets just call it a day and just say three words...they are gills. Thats all you have to do. Don't agree with me if you wish but still. I re-explain why they are clearly gills. First of all....they don't have the same skin texture as the rest of the body...they are gill shaped..... they are in the common area were most fish would have gills..... it has the same pattern as gills...and it looks like theres no skin underneith them or at least some but like little lines to breath under water. There is no other way for me to explain it. And yes I may have made quit a few threads and have corrected many people but I can't change that because thats what I do...I debate. If you guys want me to change i'm sorry but its not going to happen.