Comments (Page 179)

I like warbats look, it looks like a cobra. The Electric tail is cool, I love it!

I’m putting my tiny collection here,

I didn't watch a movie to get in to the Godzilla Universe. I think I saw a picture of Godzilla and then started to look some information of it. Then I watched movies. That's My story.

i hate asylum.  who dosnt?

me too

WFHNEIERHG3TJ IREYGVINFJDFKWFEU

sometimes when i dont know what to type i just

vnjihfujcfmfjicamkiajjui

HOW DID I FORGET TRANSMORPHERS? AUFUJREIFNJECMCFCIKMD,L-

Heh...

HOW DID I FORGET TRANSMORPHERS? AUFUJREIFNJECMCFCIKMD,L-

but yes

i have n o c l u e what that is, totally. it's very original and its own thing and NOT copying another popular series.

Oh my god that's so stupid. I agree with Katozilla, tho.

Don't forget one of their most famous rip-offs:

(Gee, I wonder what they were trying to be...)

and if ya'll would like to know a bit more about them the channel Diamondbolt did some reviews of their....masterpieces.

he also did some other stuff he's cool

but yeah, the Asylum needs to have all the workers locked up in one

Yeah I have seen Avengers Grimm on my Amazon Fire t.v.

I swear I will upload pics of my collection AND my clock.

Monster_Zero

Asylum makes Mockbusters, Movies meant to capitalize on the success of other movies. You and sonictiger both seem to like marvel, so I’ll show you the mock buster they made for Avengers, Avengers Grimm.

As for the Mock Buster themselves. Because they are made only to capitalize, they don’t care what quality of effects, story, or character there is. So they’re often not good. Just bad, Not so bad it’s good, but just bad.

Everything they make is what you'd find at the dollar store.

Dumb everything

That's Asylum...

Y'know, I have heard of asylum. Don't they make those really dumb horror movies?

Yes it is

"A NEWWWW RECOOOOORD!"

Hmmm....I don't know....

I wish my school would show me how to use 3D models.

“Cry for attention” Lol. But That is a good description of asylum

This reminds me of those Mega Shark vs.... movies.

I think funniest "cry for attention" they did was this:

They actually tried to claim that this 2005 "movie" inspired a 1933 classic (and its remakes) and another classic made in 1993. Also, it's funny that they mention Jurassic Park, because from what I've seen there aren't any dinosaurs in it, so they pretty much mentioned it to get attention.

I like it. I think they could've changed or added some parts to the script too.

P R E H I S T O R I C  C A T T I P I L L E R S.

SasquaDash,
Which is a cute try and all, but hardly seriously comparable since nothing in The Dark Knight sets up such a precedence, whereas Shin Godzilla did.

Additionally, it should be noted that Nolan didn't want to do a sequel to The Dark Knight and leave it on the cliff hanger of Batman driving away.

G. H. (Gman)

Imagine if The Dark Knight ended with Batman growing a second head that spits acid, only for them to completely ignore it in the sequel, never mentioning how or why it happened. Why would they add something like that? Who knows, maybe there's a meaning to it...

SarcasticGoji,
Which is exactly the point. If Godzilla was the "perfect life form" and he was trying to evolve into a committee of people working together, what does that say about us and our potential?

G. H. (Gman)

You said something interesting that’s made me think. Shin Godzilla is a satire of the government but is still patriotic at the same time. Rather than making the government officials caricatures and cowards or power hungry, they’re portrayed as people trying their best

Kattozilla,
Me too. Leaving on cliffhangers like Gamera 3 asks, "do you have faith?" GMK asks, "Will a culture take responsibility?" Shin Godzilla wonders, "Is humanity (or more specifically Japan) coming together to face adversity enough to overcome said adversity? Will a nation come together to be stronger?"

I for one love the fact that these movies use the a visual medium to convey high concept themes. It's a distilled variation of how Un Chein Andalou showed film can be used beyond conventional storytelling. It's more interesting than using these scenes as ideas for the sake of blockbuster world expansion. It's one of the many reasons why I don't think the franchise works very well as a Hollywood blockbuster franchise--Or at least as well.

I've always liked things like this, where you have to think about it, or you yourself can imagine what will happen next

SasquaDash,
I believe that line of thinking is influenced more by the MCU these days and its concept of stingers and dangling plot lines that do carry over. But there are plenty of films that end on "cliffhangers" with no intention of expansion which is exactly why I don't think it is disappointing. Think about the end of Gamera 3, or the spinning top at the end of Inception, or the star child in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

The point of introducing these scenes (not ideas) is because it's meant to be seen as an expressionistic moment for the art form, not a sterile, mandated reason to continue anything. They're not setting up a sequel, they're ending the story while giving the audience something to chew on as they exit the auditorium.

Wondering where the beating heart, the 5th form and Gamera's final battle leads really misses the forest for the trees.

Ok, Madison was somewhat developed (but got screwed over in GVK) and I thought Ishiro had a lot of the good lines.

Totally coulda used development though...

That’s  shame. But I don’t understand claiming undeveloped characters are better than ones with good arcs.

G. H. (Gman)

My issue with them is that they were introduced with no actual plan of expanding on the idea. The concept of a humanoid Godzilla army could be interesting for a sequel, but because there isn't going to be a sequel, their appearance ends up feeling pointless. It's like the end of GMK when they show Godzilla's beating heart at the bottom of the ocean, hinting that he will regenerate and return, only to completely ignore that idea and continuity in following film. What's the point of introducing ideas like this if they're not going to be used? What's the point of setting up a sequel, only to not make one? Because of this, their existence feels more like a cheap twist that's only there for shock value. It's almost as if the filmmakers are saying "Hey you want to see what happens next? Well Too Bad! You don't deserve answers!" If they made a sequel that included them I wouldn't have a problem, but because they won't, it comes off as wasted potential.

Aaron-Taylor Johnson did better in his extended cameo in Tenet and as Quicksilver in Avengers: Age of Ultron.

I just didn't feel very convinced by his acting.

I worked in the plot, and Ford and Godzilla reflected each other. That’s why I avoid the negatives when I go into a movie, to see it and find the usually more abundant positives. 

And the second act. It’s not bad. The Muto sequence is great, on the train, and them finding the the muto gone from the nuclear waste container. The military planning is great and realistic, and people give ford a hard time for not emoting, but that’s because they expect a character to be mopey. If you watch the scenes where he’s happy you can see the talent the actor has.

Ishiro Seriwaza was great but the other G'14 characters sucked

and tbh I don't CARE about Joe.

He's fine, but wasted.  In fact, when he died the movie went quickly downhill from there.