Personally I'd go with (as an introductory run through):

50s Gojira

60s Ghidorah the 3 Headed Monster

70s Gigan (maybe Smog Monster, if you're looking for unique)

80s Biollante (a good entry point to Godzilla's wierdness factor)

90s Gozilla vs. Mechagodzilla (hands down)

00s Godzilla against Mechagodzilla (Tokyo SOS is better, but you have to see the first Kiryu or it doesnt make sense)

10s Godzilla '14 (though I hope to be able to say KOTM by next year)

I didn't even know this existed, but it still looks interesting. Nice.

      Its probably going to be in a scene of Ghidorahs origins

So awesome

 I think it will be Kumonga and Angurius.

This is definitely a 10 the story is so organized and awesome Great Job Tomuyuki Tanka would be proud. Godzilla would be glad someone told his story so well.

THIS IS DOPE AS HELL

Man, can't wait to see the others!

Godzilla especially will look pretty good with those new dorsal plates :D

Frank's painting looks great as always. 

Awesome. Love NECA!

Chris

Anyone in any capacity is capable of pretending their position is far above what it really is, sir, whether in politics or following a fictional fandom.  I left this site a while back out of annoyance because genuine, spiteful elitism condescendingly informed me that people I respected and admired within the fandom who have done a great deal of good in the lives of thousands of fans were, basically, "fake", and unworthy of their prestige.  It was repulsive to me to see that here, but it's true in person with that same mindset of the fanbase, and it tends to go hand in hand with the opinions spoken of at length here.

I'm not here to start fights, quite the opposite, I'm trying to encourage a better mindset, one that tries to forget the temptation of snobbery and remember that this is a fictional genre we love and that there should be no place for that sentiment, but the fact is it does exist and it adds an unpleasant element to something that doesn't need it, but that thankfully will continue on in spite of it.  Just my two cents, and I appreciate everyone who has joined in.

YukisSpecial: There will always be a-holes everywhere, even in the G fandom, hiding behind "old guard" or "elitist" tags. Just ignore them or if not, tell them point blank they are wrong and if they don't like it, too bad, deal with it. 

Godzillatheking123,
Gloss and titles are the smoke and mirrors of conversation my friend. But mostly titles. ;)

I think it's important to remember that difference in opinion is what makes a fandom so engaging. I would not go as far to say some act as "elitists", but rather are just as passionate about their views as you are yours.

I'm a huge advocate of differing opinions because that's where the best conversations are birthed. I would hope no one takes offense to other articulating an opposing viewpoint.

With Godzilla now inspiring new generations of G fans, some of which may be new to the franchise and not a veteran like many of us, we need to expect that there will be polarized opinions regarding the execution of these films. CGI, practical effects, etc... Expect that.

As with any large group of people with unique viewpoints, I encourage discussion and debate, but try not to take opposing views personally. Share your points, engage with one another and take your debates to new depths. That's the whole point of this forum. No one should feel like they're not "part of a camp" or disregarded as not a true fan for their opinion.

G. H. (Gman): "I think the problem with elitism is it comes in a few forms and sometimes it's just misconstrued by the overtly sensitive--Which an individual here seems to suffer from."

Now who are might that be. Come on, be specific. ;)

TheGMan123

If I may bounce off of your point, sir, for me that manifests at both conventions and online talking to other fans who take one of three approaches in this conversation and have laid all on me personally when just talking about the varying technical elements of the films; 1 is that they accuse you of being an illegitimate fan if you accept modern methods, we've heard and seen enough of that.  2 is actual pity, as if you're somehow a sell out because you find something to appreciate in the digital approach because it's giving into Hollywood and big money.  3 is just simply misunderstanding your stance and making judgments and assumptions like we've seen a lot of even on this site, not really comprehending that you can appreciate both.  The biggest mistake I keep seeing in this discussion is falling back on the statement that it's some of us "advocating for the superiority of digital", when that's not the issue at all, but the landscape is changing and since it is we hope it will do its utmost best to tell good stories and represent the characters we love accurately.  If the height of technology was hand puppets it would still be the same, make the best damn hand puppets you can and tell the best story, but if something can create a worthy alternative then by all means, let's explore it and not be puppet elitists demeaning the other fans :P

Of course, the discussion really isn't about that part of the debate, Ben.

It's more about how people are interacting with one another through these analyses and perspectives. It's clear that enough people feel that an elitist attitude has propagated to a noticeable degree with regards to addressing the topic.

While laying such criticisms is fine, it should be done with respect to the people who hold opposing critical perspectives. No method is inherently superior, as they're all just means to an end of entertaining the viewer; however, there's a perception that some people believe different, that there is a "superior" one that must be held above the "inferior" one, with the latter being "put down for being inferior".

Whether or not this perception is objectively accurate isn't really as relevant as the fact that some of us seem to see it when we're just trying to honestly talk about our favourite things about the franchise and its direction.

Huge-Ben

Well I can truthfully say I absolutely agree with everything you just said.  While I found the CGI in G'14 quite good the rest of the film didn't really live up to it for me, so the whole thing suffers and no amount of good CGI can fix that.  The point here, again, since I feel like I have to clarify this over and over, wasn't to tout CGI as superior, and that's not the point, but it's the thing that gets thrown back in our faces when any of us say we like seeing the way the technology has grown and celebrate when it's used well.  The elitism annoyance is just that hard core section of the fanbase which loudly decries the use of any tools other than the traditional and makes us out to be anything less than "good", sincere or well informed fans if we don't fall in line with that thinking.  All in all, yeah, I prefer practical, but I feel one genre that well honed CGI can elevate very well is the kaiju genre, and I'm glad it's reached the point it has at this place in time to show us this particular vision with the Monsterverse.  It deserves as much respect for the craft as the suits.

TheGMan123,
I think the problem with elitism is it comes in a few forms and sometimes it's just misconstrued by the overtly sensitive--Which an individual here seems to suffer from. For example, recently, Michael Dougherty said something in the new Total Film article that has rubbed a few fans the wrong way:

"It wouldn't be a true Godzilla film if you didn't touch upon those things. Otherwise you're just making a big dumb giant monster movie ... you're not being faithful to the original intent of the series. Anyone who thinks otherwise is not a true Godzilla fan."

Yup. The guy everyone has been worshiping for the last half year just pulled the, "you're not a true fan" card. But here's the deal, I don't think he was targeting anyone specifically when he said that. The fact is when protecting a franchise you love/drawing more attention to its lesser known, positive attributes, it's sometimes impossible not to ruffle some feathers. I appreciate his passion and the balls he had to say it like he thought.

I don't really greenlight the, "you're not a true fan" line--But that's getting feathers ruffled over the less important thing he said.

In terms of CG vs. tokusatsu, I think it's important to understand the roots of both and why that effects the franchise. There are some perceptions being missed in light of the very whittled down, "good thing CG is here to save the day," mentality. (Which, in itself, is also elitist.)

Whether that ruffles some feathers or not is entirely up to those taking part in the conversation.

Since we're all stating our opinions, I for one have to say overused CGI does not make the storytelling better. You don't hear people complain about Shin Godzilla because the CGI for that movie looked practical. To me, that's good CGI when done correctly.

Yes, the methods are going to change over time. However, when CGI is mixed over CGI and the movie has a lot of dark scenes to hide how poor the CGI is some shots or when they have to add rain effects to it to cover it up, that's not entirely good CGI. I don't mind CGI as long as it's done correctly or is an assisting tool the way it was used for Gamera 3. The problem with today's standards in CGI is that it's not as "Groundbreaking" as it was during Jurassic Park or whatever film have you that had good CGI. I'm always going to prefer practical effects over CGI, but have nothing against CGI if that makes sense.

Entertainment though while we are on that topic, is found more in the film than just exciting special effects. Entertainment can be found in great story telling through a solid well written script that keeps the viewer engaged and can also be found in interesting characters who don't end up as cardboard characters that people can't really engage in. When characters can't be written well from the story telling and badly written by the story teller, it's gonna hurt in the long run.

The 98 movie can be entertaining on it's own, the main issue is, as always, the "Godzilla" title to it. It did not look or acted remotely like Godzilla should, hence the hate heaped on it. 

YukisSpecial: I'm sorry if I offend anyone, but I don't have time to tolerate any "elitism" over Godzilla. G fandom should be open to all, young and old, rich and poor, of different ethnicities and religions, and that means it should be a big tent that caters to varied interest and taste. If those "old guard" don't like it, too bad, they can take their "suitmation-is-the-only-real-Godzilla" nonsense and shove it up their...you know.  

It's interesting how not one of those "old guard" seem to realize that the Japanese themselves don't have such an issue over the suitmation over CGI "debate". Haruo Nakajima himself never said "only-suitmation-works-for-Godzilla". For the Japanese, suitmation was a pragmatic means to address the limitations of budget, time and special effects technology of the time. After all, as I am sure you all know, Eiji Tsuburaya had wanted to use stop-motion as the preferred means to show Gojira, but can't due to time and money constraints, so suitmation wasn't even their first or ideal choice!

Sure, over time, they develop a degree of admiration and reverence for suitmation in Japan, but they never saw it as the "only" style that Godzilla must be portrayed in. Heck, even with Ultraman, they now liberally use CGI, and I don't see any massive uproar or boycott of Ultraman in Japan because of it. 

TheGMan123

I think the highlight you mentioned was that we don't honestly want that art form we love to die, that's  never the point, but the industry and the tools have caught on and raised the bar and we as people just like seeing things develop and the tools create new possibilities.  My wife and I were talking about the article after I wrote it and she compared it to the claymation Raptors in the original Jurassic park that would have been versus the digital segments we got like the kitchen scene.  In retrospect, yes, we can confidently say we're glad the tools developed gave us the version we have.  That's not to say the claymation was BAD, Phil Tippet was a genius, but JP would not be the classic it is today I believe if they had made all the dinosaurs claymation in 1993.  That's not a slam against claymation, it's the reality of what looked better for the story they wanted to tell.

The same for the Big G.  We love the suits, but if the tools can tell the best possible story and draw in fans with the new tools, bring it on.

Adding a PS to this for those who read the article, I wanted to mention that part of the inspiration for this writing was out of reaction to individuals on this site who personify that elitist mindset and who irked me for trying to prove their points by putting words in other peoples' mouths.

I and another fan were discussing that ideal digital for the future is well done, purposeful and well realized CGI and that CGI done right is a good evolution of special effects, but the other party claimed we were saying that "CGI was superior" and twisted what we meant.  This is a part of that "gatekeeping" nonsense I mentioned before.

I just encourage my fellow fans to not apologize for encouraging new methods of special effects, and to not allow yourself to be brow beaten by the gatekeepers.  It's ok to like practical, it's ok to prefer digital, and don't let them put you in an imaginary box.  Enjoy the fandom and don't succumb to the snobbery, because if it's not fun then it's not worthwhile.  And sometimes you have to just let the old guard pretend that they know what's best.  Just don't let them ruin the thing you treasure.

One cannot deny that there is a bit of elitism with regards to addressing the differences in technique. It could just be the blunt and contextually-lacking nature of plain text on the internet, but this post is founded on some real anecdotes.

It's not like any of us want the craft of tokusatsu to die out or anything. Far from it, we'd rather there be a variety of ways in which to craft the characters and stories we love to enjoy. But there needs to be an appropriate community attitude that supports this notion.

Even you, original Gman, have sometimes come across this way when addressing the difference between CGI and suitmation. I'm sure you never meant it, but the way you worded things sometimes came with the kinds of connotations this thread was made in response, at least in interpretation.

Basically, we're all allowed to think about things one way or another, but we need to work on ensuring that it's done in a way that doesn't step on people's toes.

I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with using CG effects and what not to bring Godzilla to life. I'm not quite in, say, Jeff Zornow's court from G-Fest a few years ago regarding his rather passionate negative tirade on Pacific Rim.

I do however want to stress the difference between "outdated" and "different". I believe it was Kiyotaka Tiguchi who said, "Why can't a miniature building, just look like a miniature building?" Accepting that the style of tokusatsu was not realistic and that they were sufficient realizations unto themselves for the specific style they were going for.

For example, Kill Bill, 300, Dick Tracey, etc, don't look realistic at all--But that's the point. Likewise, Godzilla, Gamera, tokusatsu, etc, became their own entity existing as a stylistic art piece. Many of the crew at Tsuburaya Productions consider themselves artists over anything. (Which could also help explain why their legal staff was so easily steamrolled the last couple of decades, but that's another topic entirely.)

Was it conducive for growing a mainstream audience? No, but I don't think that really matters. Many self-proclaimed indie artists aren't exactly making movies for a massive turnout either.

Crew members at Tsuburaya and Toei take a lot of pride in the current shows/movies they work on don't consider it outdated at all. They cite the original Godzilla as being the father to the style they're dedicated to and rightfully so--Tsuburaya is the father of Japanese special effects and Godzilla is the King of tokusatsu.

In America Godzilla's more of a pauper to things we've seen before--Cameron and Spielberg. Jurassic Park and Terminator 2. Which is expected considering the goal and audience in the west, but no less true. (I have mixed feelings on where Shin Godzilla falls in that category only because of the overwhelming amount of miniature work that most aren't aware of.)

I'm glad the genre is getting a little more exposure from it - Pacific Rim in particular has become one of my all time favorite films - But it does sort of resonate with something Matt Frank said to me awhile back, "Western audiences don't care if the movie looks realistic, they care if it looks expensive."

Indeed. Different? Sure. Remember "state of the art" depends on the advances in specific techniques, not what the technique itself is. Knowing that, certain techniques used in Ultraman Geed last year are actually no less "state of the art".

The series actually felt like a Godzilla series and Godzilla, largely, acted like Godzilla. The weird similarities to the Hanna-Barbera cartoon were kind of interesting--It sort of improved on a lot of those ideas.

It hasn't aged particularly well, but it's still fairly entertaining. The three part Monster Wars arc was a definite highlight. Great music too. Shame it ended without much closure.

You took the words out of my mouth. This is exactly how i see Godzilla: Final Wars. A love song to the series and a final chapter. This movie concludes an era, and rightfully so since this was the last movie were costumes were fully used, the last time we would see Toho's water pond, getting the star on the Walk of Fame in Hollywood etc.

The movie for me is more than just a terrorist invasion, or Kaiju fighting. Final Wars for me is about Hope, hope for the future.

Some people argue what was Minilla's part in the movie. some people think Minilla was unnecessary. That the movie didn't need him. But for me, he not only represents the greater love that Godzilla has for him, but also represents hope.

If a sequel was to be made, in a more decent world, Minilla grows up to be a benevolent Godzilla, friend with Humanity. Probably recipient of the energy of the father, similarly to Godzilla vs Destoroyah. Minilla would not only defend earth like his father did, but also humanity.

Grew up with both, and while I agree that the series is superior and a better example of what Zilla should have been, I still have some nostalgic love for '98, and honestly find it pretty entertaining to this day.  I shared notes with other fans of where we ranked all the films from least to most favorite, and I realized that honestly I still like 1998 better than about 5 of the original Toho fims in terms of sheer entertainment factor and the creature just looking cool

The series though did a good job of paying respects to the old while continuing the 98 story, and deserves a place of value in the fandom overall.

I've watched a few episodes on Youtube and it seems alright for a kid's show. 

I'm thinking it's Mothra. When I looked closer at the image, I could see the faint outline of wings. The body is too small to be Godzilla's or Rodan's, and Mothra is the only one with a small body height, only standing at 15 meters tall. Mothra also has a history of being set on fire, mainly in the millennium series.

50s: Gojira (1954). Arguably the best. Great start and excellent film.

60s: Invasion of Astro Monster (1965). Fun movie with great monster action and great human story.

70s: Godzilla vs Hedorah (1971). This one is hard for me. I am torn between this and Terror of Mechagodzilla. But the strangeness of this film gets me every time. I also love the theme.

80s: Godzilla vs Biollante (1989). I wish this were made 1 year later so I could say it is my favorite of the 90s because I also like Return.

90s: Godzilla vs King Ghidorah (1991). The 90s is my least favorite decade for Godzilla films. At least this one tries something and isn't just a Michael Bay explosion fest.

00s: GMK (2001). Solid godzilla film. The eyes are great.

10s: Shin Godzilla (2016). This is the only film that I sometimes think is better than the original. It is great all around. Good monster stuff. Interesting human story.

1. Gojira (1954)

2. Mothra Vs. Godzilla (1964)

3. Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla (1974)

4. The Return of Godzilla (1984)

5. Godzilla Vs. SpaceGodzilla (1994)

6. Godzilla Vs. Megaguirus (2000)

7. Shin Gojira (2016)

Godzillatheking123

I can appreciate standing firm on things you believe matter that are worth fighting for, but when it comes to entertainment mediums it annoys me because this segment of the fandom treats kaiju like a religious experience rather than a realm of fictional characters and storytelling which inevitably and rightfully use the tools of their time to draw in their audience and continue to tell more stories.  I feel a lot of that elitist mentality comes from a fear that their favorite thing won't be "special" anymore, that by making it new with modern methods and inviting in others to enjoy it who wouldn't have before that they lose specialness by having to share it with "noobs", but it's either that or watch the thing you love stay in the shadow of media that adapts well to the methods. 

Personally I find Shin Godzilla to be boring, but it's an excellent example of how modern effects were well crafted to make the old story breathe some new life again, and I'm still hard pressed to find any Toho Godzilla fan who doesn't consider it "real" and worthy of the title other than some inexplicably stupid remarks I've read here on the Disqus comments ;)

TheGMan123

Agreed, it was just bothering me to hear this rather one-way street line of thought coming from fans who I'm sure think of themselves as "truer" fans than those who embrace the new methods.  I have to stress there's nothing wrong with preferring the old school films or saying they're superior, it's just the inability to acknowledge the good qualities and inevitability of special effects, it's empty thinking to write off anything that uses different tools to create the same overall positive experience in entertainment and storytelling if it does it well, and so far on the monster side of things the Monsterverse is two for two (soon very likely to be three) in giving us GOOD kaiju action with modern means. I just want to see some of that old school kaiju stubbornness chill the frick out and not brow beat the means or the fans that like them.

Anyway thank you guys for giving this ridiculous article a look :P

I always say to enjoy something for yourself before you consider what others think. You'll find it's much easier to deal with fictional entertainment that way.

Snide comments and remarks are unavoidable so long as one person thinks one thing and another thinks something else, but we can work together to minimize their voices and bring some real excitement and positivity.

I think that's apt, yeah. It also helps that it's in its own standalone universe where Goji was immune to the oxygen destroyer and we have the power and awe of Goji fighting other incredible beings front and center. There's no issue with Keizer Goji being all these things because this little pocket movie  already exists in a perfect world, so to speak, where forgiveness is universal (vis a vis any other Godzilla movie). I think of it as like a love song to this endless battle they've subjected Goji to. It's certainly not always the most engaging of the films to rewatch, but it functions perfectly, I think, as a conclusion to the Goji legacy preceding it. 

I don't get the sort of zero-sum mentality of the fringe corner of G fandom. Accepting CGI now does not mean the old suitmation is automatically bad or chessy. It's not an either-or proposition. You can like BOTH. 

It's like those debates that Trekkies have about which version of starship Enterprise they like the most. Some hardcore fans think only the original NCC-1701 is the "real" Enterprise and the rest, whether it's Next Generation or the reboot films, is not acceptable. 

My personal thinking is live and let live. One should not divide Godzilla universe into absolute dichotomies between "superior" suitmation or CGI. It's the monster design and the quality of the overall movie that counts, not the method of how Godzilla is portrayed. If you like suitmation, fine. If you like CGI, fine. Just don't try to insist and demand your favorite form of Godzilla is the only one true Godzilla. 

Life is too short to be so dogmatic and rigid. 

OK... picture this... all 4 posters done in 3-D lenticular style... and available for purchase on Amazon... now.. besides me... who else would buy them ?

This is a purely subjective choice, not saying my selection is better than others, just my pick:

1. Gojira (1954), don't think there is another real choice for the 50's. Godzilla Raids Again was charming, but it can't compare to the sheer power of the original.

2.  King Kong vs Godzilla (1962), strange choice perhaps, since the 60's offer the introduction of the other classic kaijus, but it's my nostalgic favorite.

3. Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla (1974), we get to see Mecha for the first time, 'nuff said.

4. Godzilla vs Biollante (1989): The movie is uneven, but the design of Biollante is kinda neat, almost like Toho's take on the Little Shop of Horrors.

5. Godzilla vs Destroyah (1995): We get to see the burnt form Godzilla, and his "death" was unexpectedly touching. Good stuff. 

3. GMK (2001): Good movie, I like how it recaptured the terror and horrific nature of Godzilla.