Godzilla 2014 toy reveal

DemiRyu
MemberMothra LarvaeDecember 27, 20133607 Views32 Replies[Jan 8th, 2014] Post has had to be removed due to request from Legendary. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- Chris Picard
I really like his... mane?
it looks like a chibi if u ask me; is an ornament to keychain?
If this is real, the toy looks like one of those simple cheap toys. HOWEVER, we all know that the Godzilla in the Movie looks incredible, Also, the spikes on the book, and the toy are FAR from what they looked like in the trailer. BUT I do like how his arms are lizard/human-like. Rather than T-Rex-like. You all feel let down because you expected an exact detail on detail life-like movie quality expensive holy mother model. Just remember, this is a simple toy that comes with the book. Calm down! Im sure you will not complain about his design when you see him moving around destroying everything in his path when you watch the movie.
I'm more bemused by a lack of any identifiable manufacturers logo. Toys are plastered with them, this one has nothing.
The manufacturer's (Running Press) logo is clearly visible on the side/spine of the box.
If you look up pictures of some of their other box-sets, such as the "Light-up Starship Enterprise Mega Mini Kit," you'll find that those have the same package type Running Press used with this one.
The logo also has the red kanji behind the "GODZILLA" text. Anyone who thinks it's a Z - please find a better/bigger copy of the pic.
I love the attitude that fans have, they somehow can tell if something is magically fake based on how much they dislike something. Same thing happened when they started revealing new Pokemon for X and Y and how people, up until they got their copy of the game, didn't believe it.
That being said. I'd say I'm 60% sure this is real. It just seems like a really silly thing to fake; but I could be wrong.
This looks like the kind of cheap toy that little kids get from McDonalds.
FOR SCIENCE OF COURSE!
Totally fake, what a JOKE!!
@ZILLAMASTER55 - Your analysis leaves something to be desired my friend. The only light source that I can see is the one that is obviously in front of the three different objects. In fact, the ONLY thing I can see that would even begin to suggest photoshop is that the book casts no shadow at all. Aside from that, the box and the toy are obviously real and in the shot.
I've got a good eye for things like this, and photoshop is the first thing disgruntled fans often shout. It's like the boy who cried wolf. You don't like it, you call it fake without checking sources for it first. You want to find a source, look for it yourself. Or are you too lazy and scared to do so because you fear you might find it authentic?
If you guys want a source for this, just search for it yourselves. Lazy bums.